Servo Retrofit on Old Hydraulic Presses Looks Good on Paper but Disappointing On-Site? You Only Truly Upgrade When the Pump Is Upgraded Too
Servo Retrofit on Old Hydraulic Presses Looks Good on Paper but Disappointing On-Site? You Only Truly Upgrade When the Pump Is Upgraded Too
2022-12-12
Servo energy-saving retrofit has been on the upgrade roadmap of many factories for years.
The principle is straightforward: replace the original asynchronous motor and fixed-displacement pump with a servo motor and speed control to reduce energy consumption and noise.
However, in practice, many retrofitted machines fail to achieve the expected results.
Industry Context: When Servo Retrofit Falls Short
Even after upgrading the motor and drive and tuning parameters multiple times, engineers often observe:
Energy savings lower than theoretical expectations
Pressure instability during pressing and holding
Persistent noise, despite the servo system
These issues suggest that upgrading only the motor side does not address the root cause.
Root Cause: Conventional Pumps Are Not Designed for Servo Operation
Traditional gear pumps and vane pumps are optimized for fixed-speed operation.
When used in servo systems, especially at low speed, several limitations appear:
Volumetric efficiency drops significantly at 200–400 r/min
Flow and pressure pulsation become more pronounced
As a result, the servo control system must compensate with wider safety margins, reducing overall efficiency.
Core Approach: Treat Pump and Servo as a Unified System
To achieve real performance gains, modern retrofit solutions combine:
Servo motor + FG series high-pressure internal gear pump
rather than upgrading the motor alone.
This ensures that both the drive and the hydraulic source are matched to variable-speed operation.
Retrofit Engineering Method
A typical retrofit process follows a structured approach.
Step 1: Define Duty Cycle and Pressure Requirements
Maximum working pressure (commonly 20–25 MPa, up to 28–30 MPa in some cases)
Required flow during fast approach
Pressure stability requirements during slow pressing and holding
Step 2: Select FG Pump Family and Displacement
FG1 (25–40 mL/r) for single-cylinder presses with moderate stroke and cycle time
FG1 (40–50 mL/r) or FG2 (64–80 mL/r) for multi-cylinder or higher-flow systems
Rated pressure: 31.5 MPa
Maximum pressure: up to 35 MPa
These specifications exceed the requirements of most legacy machines.
Step 3: Match Servo Drive and Speed Range
FG pumps operate within a wide speed range of 200–3000 r/min:
High speed provides sufficient flow for fast approach
Low speed maintains stable volumetric efficiency for pressing and holding
This allows the servo system to regulate flow through speed control effectively, without being limited by leakage or pulsation.
Performance Improvements After Retrofit
After integrating FG pumps into servo retrofits, engineers typically report:
Pressure curves that closely follow setpoints, especially during pressing and holding
Cleaner motor current curves with fewer spikes, improving actual energy efficiency
Noticeable noise reduction, replacing sharp pump noise with a smoother background sound
These improvements reflect better coordination between the drive system and the hydraulic source.
Engineering Value: A Repeatable Retrofit Solution
For technical managers planning plant-wide upgrades, the FG series provides more than incremental improvement.
It delivers a standardized hydraulic solution that integrates:
Energy efficiency
Pressure stability
Noise reduction
into a single, repeatable system architecture.
Summary
Servo retrofit success depends on both the motor and the hydraulic pump.
By combining servo drives with FG internal gear pumps, manufacturers can achieve:
Energy savings closer to theoretical expectations
Stable pressure control across the entire cycle
Reduced noise and improved working conditions
Consistent performance across multiple machines
For future retrofit projects, selecting the appropriate displacement within FG0, FG1, or FG2 enables a scalable and repeatable upgrade path without redesigning the hydraulic source each time.